Posted on Leave a comment

Symptoms Checklist-90-R

Positive psychology online therapy

The Symptom Checklist-90-Revised (SCL-90-R) is a widely used self-report inventory that evaluates a broad range of psychological symptoms and psychopathological dimensions. Below is a list of its 12 primary symptom dimensions (subscales) and the scoring key used for interpretation. Email us to get your report – therapists@whjonline.com

No.SubscaleDescription
1Somatization (SOM)Distress arising from perceived bodily dysfunction (e.g., headaches, pains)
2Obsessive-Compulsive (O-C)Thoughts, impulses, and actions that are experienced as unremitting and irresistible
3Interpersonal Sensitivity (I-S)Feelings of personal inadequacy and inferiority in comparison to others
4Depression (DEP)Symptoms typical of depressive syndromes, including dysphoric mood, hopelessness
5Anxiety (ANX)Signs of nervousness, tension, panic, and restlessness
6Hostility (HOS)Anger, aggression, irritability, and resentment
7Phobic Anxiety (PHOB)Persistent fears of specific situations or objects, including avoidance
8Paranoid Ideation (PAR)Suspiciousness, fear of loss of autonomy, projective thoughts
9Psychoticism (PSY)Spectrum of psychotic-like symptoms, from withdrawal to hallucinations
10Global Severity Index (GSI)Mean of all 90 items; best indicator of overall distress
11Positive Symptom Total (PST)Number of items rated above 0; measures symptom breadth
12Positive Symptom Distress Index (PSDI)Mean of items rated above 0; reflects symptom intensity

Scoring & Reporting

To measure the impact of your psychosomatic symptoms, you are required to assess how much you were bothered by 90 unique symptoms. Kindly book your symptoms check-up for the full list and your report. Each of the 90 items is rated on a 5-point Likert scale:

ValueDescription
0Not at all
1A little bit
2Moderately
3Quite a bit
4Extremely
  • T-scores or percentile ranks are used to compare against normative samples.

  • Cut-off for clinical concern is typically a Global Severity Index (GSI) T-score ≥ 63 or 2 subscales with T ≥ 63.

In therapy we discuss these symptoms and presenting problems, general psychological well-being, and the treatment plan. Particularly when examining the experience of lonliness vs. solitude, we can tap into Gestalt Therapy as well in addition to Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy specific to your needs. Modulating isolation is one of the key components of self-compassion here, reflecting the belief that one’s suffering is uniquely personal and disconnected from the broader human experience. The intensity of this disconnection ranges from mild, moderate, severe to neurotic. In this regard, overcoming anxious thoughts is crucial to regulate the central nervous system and vice-versa. That’s why discussing the psychosomatic symptoms is important and can positively impact the aging brain, more specifically grey matter volume (Pagnoni & Cekic, 2007).

The SCL-90-R measures isolation-related distress across several symptom domains, especially within the interpersonal sensitivity, depression, and psychoticism subscales (Derogatis, 1994; Derogatis & Unger, 2010). These subscales can provide a multi-layered understanding of how perceived disconnection (isolation) contributes to emotional distress, self-judgment, and psychopathological symptoms in you. By integrating self-compassion frameworks with symptom severity profiles, a mental health professional can more precisely identify how internal attitudes, in essence, harsh self-criticism and feelings of separateness, translate into broader psychological struggles, and can help cope through interventions that promote common humanity and emotional resilience. More and more people are tired of being resilient and look for a breathing room that holds space so that the inner child can feel and the adult self can grow. 

If you or anyone you know is suffering, connect with Dr. Anney Roy, Ph.D. at arc@whjonline.com.

Quantum leaps for advance mental healthcare.

References

  1. Derogatis, L. R. (1994). SCL-90-R: Administration, scoring, and procedures manual (3rd ed.). Minneapolis, MN: National Computer Systems.
  2. Derogatis, L. R., & Unger, R. (2010). Symptom Checklist-90-Revised. In The Corsini Encyclopedia of Psychology (4th ed., Vol. 4, pp. 1743–1745). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470479216.corpsy0970
  3. Pagnoni, G., & Cekic, M. (2007). Age effects on gray matter volume and attentional performance in Zen meditation. Neurobiology of Aging28(10), 1623–1627. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2007.06.008
Posted on Leave a comment

Anna’s Case – Health Anxiety

Anna’s Case – Health Anxiety

Do you find similarities between yourself and Anna?

Anna is a 33 year old Russian woman who has been living and working in Bangalore for 5 years. She originally came to therapy with signs of health anxiety and preoccupation with physical symptoms, which seem to have been triggered by her boyfriend of four years deciding to go to Amsterdam for a year and a consequent fear of losing the relationship. It seemed in the initial session that Anna was focusing and worrying about her physical health instead of having to deal with her feelings about her boyfriend leaving. However, when the therapist asked whether this might be possible, she denied this and was in the process of undergoing repeated medical tests and scans to identify a cause for her physical symptoms. It was discussed that therapy would only be helpful for Anna when she saw at least some of her problems as being linked to psychological factors.

Six months later Anna contacted the therapist again and arranged another consultation. She was now under the care of a psychiatrist, who had started her on antidepressants and suggested she try therapy again. Anna’s boyfriend had gone to Amsterdam and the relationship had ended. She felt abandoned and empty and deeply missed the friendship. Although she felt that the relationship had probably not been right for a long time, she had stayed in it so long because she was afraid of being alone. She realized she had been dependent on her boyfriend for validation, attention and acceptance, and was struggling to adjust to being single. She noted a pattern in all relationships (with both family and past partners) of being dependent on others (for advice, looking after, self-esteem, etc.) and described herself as an “egoist” who tries to manipulate others to get what she wants and never being happy with what she gets. She had no strong hobbies, interests or passions. She had a small but good circle of friends in Prague and often spent time socializing with them. She also had regular contact with her family in Russia.

Although, Anna wanted to learn to be comfortable being alone, within a few weeks she had started flirting with colleagues in whom she had never been interested previously, in order to distract herself and get attention. Despite being insecure about her appearance, she also placed a lot of value on it and used it as her main way of interacting with males. Se described multiple instances of binge drinking, sometimes to the point of vomiting and memory loss.

Anna is under the care of a person-centered therapist. She is doing better now compared to when she started therapy. If you found similarities between your case and Anna’s, our team would be able to help you.

Personal details have been changed to preserve confidentiality.